Posted by: Jim | 07/03/2009

What Are The Most Important Primary Sources

For biblical study- excluding the Bible?  That’s at the heart of it when Kevin lists what he considers to be the most important five.  Yes, it’s another meme thing, but one that might generate some interesting insights.

So here are the five primary sources that are, in my estimation utterly essential for any adequate understanding of the biblical materials

1- ANET
2- The Dead Sea Scrolls (Sectarian materials)
3- Ethiopic Enoch
4- Jubilees
5- 1-2 Maccabees (They aren’t biblical texts to me, so I’m including them- sorry Catholic friends).

I have to say that if someone, anyone, fancies him or herself a student of the Bible but doesn’t have the aforementioned volumes in their library (and has read them), they deceive themselves.

Now as I understand these things, I’m supposed to urge 5 others to take part and share their thoughts.  Ok, I’d like to hear from Bryan Bibb, John Anderson, Chris Tilling, Michael Barber, and VHT Nguyen.


Responses

  1. I think ANET is superseded by “Context of Scripture”.

    • change superseded to supplemented and we agree.

  2. I can see 2 and 5, and maybe 3. Not sure about the rest.

  3. [...] Jump to Comments Geez, Kevin, I just got caught up on the last meme. But I concur with Jim that this new twist has the potential for some interesting thoughts. Here are Kevin’s rules: [...]

  4. [...] I’ve been pegged to respond, and when the number one bibloblogger for four months running tags you, you can’t help but respond with a sense of duty and great [...]

  5. [...] on the most important primary sources for understanding the Bible, and I’ve been tagged by Jim.  Today is my first day back in the office after 2 (count ‘em, two) weeks at the beach with [...]

  6. [...] 1 Enoch 1–36: overlap with Jim here. Who can help but love these early co-readers of the Bible? Like us, they read with care the [...]

  7. [...] Jim West (already 6 pages back and counting!) [...]


Leave a response

Your response:

Categories