Archive

Archive for 08/18/2008

Well Hold On A Minute…

08/18/2008 6 comments

The California Supreme Court rendered a decision today that really falls into the category of ‘hold on a minute’. ABC News reports

The California Supreme Court today ruled unanimously that doctors cannot cite their religious beliefs as grounds to deny gay and lesbian patients medical care.

No kidding. Sounds fair enough. If medical care means medical care and not what the case the court heard means. Read on:

Justice Joyce Kennard ruled that two Christian fertility doctors who refused to artificially inseminate a lesbian couple cannot claim a free speech or religious exemption from California’s anti-discrimination law.

Why must Christian doctors be forced to fertilize a couple? Any couple? And why doesn’t the court understand that in its efforts to hinder discrimination, it is discriminating against persons whose religious viewpoint is violated by certain practices and behaviors?

The doctors received support from the American Civil Rights Union and anti-abortion groups, according to the Associated Press. The California Medical Association initially supported the Christian doctors, until they received criticism from gay rights groups and joined the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan to oppose them.

The California Medical Association is apparently populated by people who have no standards of their own and must take a poll in order to decide how to think.

What next? Perform abortions because that’s what a small subgroup within society requires of you? If pharmacists can select which drugs they will prescribe or not- then physicians should be free to decide which procedures they perform. And if their patients don’t like it, then they are more than free to go elsewhere. The rights of the few do not outweigh the rights of the many and the tyranny of the minority has no place in a democratic society.

Categories: current events

Rick Warren Lied?

08/18/2008 3 comments

The deception of the so called ‘forum’ at Saddleback and Warren’s own deception are exposed over at the Daily Kos.

Put simply: I don’t see how Warren thought McCain was at the church when he made his claims about this “cone of silence” on TV during the forum… when he now also explicitly says he gave Obama a preview question before the event that he couldn’t give McCain because he wasn’t there yet. [italics mine]. Warren slipped up in my opinion, and has made a huge mistake. If this is the contradiction I think it is, it means he lied (not was confused, but knowingly lied) on TV during the event by saying McCain was in this now mythic “cone of silence”… and he did so in order to protect the sham integrity of his forum for a Republican who he knew may have cheated. And of course he lied on CNN just now as well, a clip and transcript of which are found below. … There may be an explanation, but my bet is it’s not a particularly good one, and not one that we should necessarily take very seriously at this point if all we have to go on afterwards is his word of honor. We should also add that if it was a purpose driven lie in order to help McCain in any way, I’ve heard that has tax implications for his so-called church, (ie his political action committee).

Watch the clip, read the rest of the essay, and then decide for yourself. Did Warren Lie? It sure seems so.

UPDATE: The New York Times has a bit more on the ‘cone of silence’ lie and intimates that Warren wasn’t the impartial moderator he was pretending to be.  And McCain wasn’t exactly forthright either.   And Warren today is adopting the Todd Bentley Defense.  I.e., if anyone questions him, they are just ’sour grapes‘.  Ah, now that’s a defense that will work…

Warren, in interview segments posted earlier today on the God-O-Meter at Beliefnet.com (yes, that’s the blog’s moniker), takes great umbrage to claims that McCain got tipped to some of the queries he would face when he followed Barack Obama onstage at the much-anticipated event.  McCain was headed to the church — in a motorcade supervised by the Secret Service — when Warren’s interview with Obama began. Upon arriving at the church, he was taken to a so-called “green room” to await his turn.  God-O-Meter Editor Dan Gilgoff asked Warren (who is much in demand after his turn as candidate inquisitor) about assertions by Obama backers that McCain got the heads-up, meaning he wouldn’t have to think as fast on his feet as his rival.  “They’re dead wrong. That’s just sour grapes…” Warren responds.

Funny how he completely ignores the lie he told that McCain was in a room in which he couldn’t hear anything at the Church.  Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive, Rick.

UPDATE II:  I’ve just come across Andrew Sullivan’s pre-debate essay titled ‘How Pernicious is Rick Warren’.  Do give it a read and pay particularly close attention to the closing paragraph- which is just right on the mark.

Categories: Theology, current events

A Couple of Things Coming Soon…

08/18/2008 6 comments

Adela Yarbro Collins has a new book titled King and Messiah As Son of God; and a massive, massive Festschrift for Richard Hays is due out in November titled The Word Leaps the Gap. I imagine both will be available hot off the press in Boston at the SBL. But if you can’t wait, you can always order them and patiently wait for them to arrive. Unless the USPS delays or loses them like they have a couple of things sent to me recently… [insert annoyed under the breath muttering here].

Categories: Books, biblical studies

Jeremiah And Lamentations

08/18/2008 Leave a comment

Many thanks indeed to Bobby K. of Hendrickson for sending along a copy of Tremper Longman’s commentary on Jeremiah and Lamentations.  It appears as one of a series titled ‘The New International Biblical Commentary’.  The whole of the New Testament is available and the Old Testament volumes seem to be appearing at a good pace.

As to the present volume, it begins with an introduction to the texts of Jeremiah and Lamentations with the usual who, what, when, where and why questions addressed.  Authorship, date, provenance, historical setting, and all are fairly traditionally maintained but the meat and substance of the commentary, and where Longman does some genuinely excellent work, is in the exegeses of the pericopae.

Longman divides the book of Jeremiah into 97 sections.  Each section receives its own treatment and then is supplemented, normally, with some further explanatory notes (called ‘additional notes’).  Longman adopts the editorial purpose of the series of which this Commentary is a part when he writes as a believer and not simply as an academic or ‘observer’.  ‘This approach marries probing, reflective interpretation of the text to loyal biblical devotion and warm Christian affection’ (p. xii of the editorial preface).

Regular readers won’t be surprised when I note that Longman’s introductory material doesn’t really offer anything new or particularly insightful in terms of his historical viewpoint.  But, as I hinted previously, he does do some brilliant exegesis when he moves from historical considerations to exegetical concerns.

In order to use the commentary the reader will have to have a copy of the Bible at hand.  Unlike many commentaries, this one doesn’t include the biblical text itself.  This can be both a good, and a bad thing.  One has to wonder, on the one hand, how many readers will actually sit with a Bible on one knee and the commentary in one hand and switch back and forth between them.  On the other hand, the absence of the biblical text may allow more variation and therefore more interaction between scholar and student.  However, my personal preference is that the biblical text be included in commentaries simply because it is immediately available thereby.

So, now, to some examples of Longman’s interpretation.  At 1:4-8 we read ‘In his [Jeremiah's] weakness, God will make him strong.  In God’s economy, it is not one’s inherent strength, abilities, or credentials that count, but rather God’s presence’ (p. 22).

Concerning 11: 18 ff – the first of Jeremiah’s Confessions, Longman adopts a rather von Radian reading and maintains that here we do indeed have a Confession of the Prophet.  Many since von Rad have abandoned this way of reading the ‘Confessions’ – but in my estimation the von Radian line of interpretation is the correct one and hence Longman is here on the right track.

On Jeremiah 23:9-40, Longman notes of the false prophets that they ‘… bear a special burden of God’s anger because they make it more difficult for the people to discern the authentic divine message’ (p. 162).  True indeed and of contemporary relevance considering the damage done by modern ‘false-speakers’ spewing disinformation in the name of God.

Longman’s best insights are reserved, though, for his explanation of 31:31-34 (pp. 210-213).  He is plainspoken, concise, and correct in his assertions and no one reading this particular passage will be able to claim that they don’t understand it.

After examining Lamentations (and he does a fine exegetical job here too) Longman concludes the volume with suggested further readings.  The list includes materials from the ‘right’ and the ‘left’ of the theological spectrum and for that open-ness to other viewpoints Longman is to be congratulated.  He only overlooks one volume on Lamentations that he should certainly have consulted and included- Chris Brady’s “The Rabbinic Targum of Lamentations”.  That one qualm aside, I can recomment Longman’s commentary.  This, of course, could not be said of his History of Israel.  But it’s only fair to commend what is commendable wherever and from whomsoever it arises.

Categories: biblical studies

The tel-Eton Website

08/18/2008 1 comment

Aren Maier earlier announced the publication of a new website for the Tel Eton Archaeological Excavation.  You’ll need to use Internet Explorer, at least at this point, to view it.  As Bob Dietel writes- ‘… the Tel Eton website is written with specific ActiveX scripts, so only will run in Internet Exploder; alax, FireFox tries to parse the code instead.’  Yup it’s a fact- it takes a while to load in I.E., but it does eventually load.  Enjoy!

Categories: biblical studies

Is Ezra Also Among the Prophets?

08/18/2008 1 comment

The Los Angeles Times reports

Here on the plains of the Tigris River lies the shrine of Ezra, the Jewish prophet, who returned to Jerusalem at the end of the Babylonian exile. According to biblical scholars, Ezra died years later back in the Mesopotamia at age 120 in what is now called Uzair. Locals believe Ezra passed away while roaming through the area with his donkey.

Ezra was a prophet? Who knew. And who are these ‘biblical scholars’ who maintain that Ezra died at the age of 120 in Mesopotamia? The Times blog post has some nice photos of the shrine of Ezra (which is mentioned merely because it has managed to survive the war unscathed- so far).

I especially like the photo of Ezra’s coffin.

The Bishop Gets Schooled

08/18/2008 Leave a comment

On August 18, 1524, the Zurich City Council sent along an “Answer” to the Bishop of Constance concerning their reform of worship.  The Bishop had expressed concern about the changes effected in Zurich of the Mass and the removal of images and the Council required of Zwingli a response, which he happily penned and which the City Fathers then sent along as their reply to the Bishop.

Zwingli’s Christliche Antwort Burgermeisters und Rats zu Zürich an Bischof Hugo schools the good Bishop on the meaning of the Mass and the reason that images ought to be rejected as supposed ‘aids to the illiterate’.

Interestingly, the booklet was written in German and not Latin (as one would normally expect when a Bishop were addressed), but Hugo was from Zurich himself and understood quite well the language Zwingli used.  The language is respectful but not cowed and Zwingli ‘tells it like it is’ in his answers, point by point, to Hugo’s 7 points.  Then he moves on to describe the true meaning of the Mass.

One of Zwingli’s summary points nicely says it all:

Christus wirdt allein ufgeopfret, da er stirbt, lydet, sin blut vergüßt.  Ist alles eins.

The mass – therefore – can’t be an offering, because Christ’s blood has already been spilled once and for all.   Hugo, consider yourself schooled!

Zwingli at table with his family

Zwingli at table with his family

Categories: biblical studies

Her Tongue Was Cut Out And She Was Burned Alive

08/18/2008 Leave a comment

By her father. A Saudi. For the high crime of converting to Christianity. Israel News reports

A young girl in Saudi Arabia was brutally executed by her Muslim father this week after he learned his daughter had converted to Christianity. Middle East business news website Zawya.com reported that the man, who is a prominent member of a “virtue committee,” first cut out his daughter’s tongue and held a one-sided religious debate with her. He then burned his daughter alive.

Some reprehensible actions such as this don’t require comment- or to have it pointed out that they are the grossest manifestations of religious fundamentalism and total depravity of the most depraved sort. Via Antonio Lombatti.

Categories: current events

Examining Rick Warren’s Real Agenda

08/18/2008 Leave a comment

Ethics Daily, a site you really ought to bookmark by the way, has a couple of essays today which take a closer look at megachurch Pastor Rick Warren. The first, Is Rick Warren Still Reading from a Small Bible begins thusly:

Mega-church pastor Rick Warren has flipped from being a cheerleader for President Bush in the fall of 2004 to claiming neutrality in the 2008 presidential election. His twist is accompanied by a widespread claim that he now has a broader moral agenda. But discerning Christians ought to ask what purpose drove his shift and did he really pivot toward a more comprehensive set of moral issues?

And the second on the ‘Saddleback Forum‘ which begins as follows:

As a long-time student of civil religion (I co-authored a book in 1988 entitled “Civil Religion and the Presidency” that the publisher quickly took out of print because the evangelical audience to which it was directed was [and still is] unwilling to face up to the matter), I stayed up last Saturday night to watch the show in California. I found it profoundly disappointing, even though Rick Warren tried to be “an honest broker,” a term German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck used about himself at the Congress of Berlin in 1878.

Read them both. Robert over at Ethics Daily (the editor) does a tremendous job of keeping an eye on the doings of religion in American society (from a historically Baptist perspective).

Categories: Theology, current events