Northwest Arkansas News reports on an upcoming (in November) PBS Nova episode that will doubtless be of interest to many readers here:
The Bible’s Buried Secrets: Nova says the film has “new discoveries that shake the foundation of biblical archaeology.” The two-hour special will delve into the origins of the Israelites to explore their slow transformation into a monotheistic people. It attempts to uncover who wrote the Hebrew Bible and whether it’s history or parable. Two of the biblical experts on hand were authors Thomas Cahill and William Dever. Each has a tall stack of credentials. One question from the assembled TV critics contained a reference to Mike Huckabee. “Dr. Dever,” the writer asked, “we had a guy who almost got nominated for president who believes that the world started 6, 000 years ago. How is one TV movie going to change the beliefs of people who don’t really understand science ?” “It won’t,” Dever said. “It’s a waste of time to argue with fundamentalists. And this film doesn’t do it. It’s designed for intelligent people who are willing to change their mind. And of course, one film is not going to change religious life in America, but it will give intelligent people who want to read the Bible in a modern way a chance. If we insist on reading the Bible literally, in 25 years nobody will read it any longer.” Suddenly, most of the critics were furiously taking notes. Cahill, who was educated by Jesuits, added fuel to the fire a few minutes later. “One of the interesting things about [Bible ] literalists,” he opined, “is that they’re always selective literalists. I don’t know why that is. They hang onto one thing or another that they preferably want to shout at you, and they forget all the other texts.” I suspect the usually outraged will be outraged as usual over this Nova presentation. I suggest watching it first before getting out the pitchforks and torches.”
As soon as Dever appears before a conservative audience, he will change his tune. And their attributing to him the title of ‘biblical expert’ is funny to boot! Anyway, who doesn’t love these ‘Biblical Archaeology’ specials! The Orlando Sentinel has a bit more info on the actual program. I especially liked this bit:
“Nova” series producer Paula Apsell acknowledged that biblical literalists and revisionists both will probably hate the film. “When I set out to do this, I very explicitly did not want to make a program that was proving or disproving that things happened in the Bible,” Apsell said. But the film challenges long-held beliefs. Abraham, Sarah and their offspring probably didn’t exist, [Carol] Meyers said. “These stories are unlikely to represent real historical events, but rather there’s some kernel of ancient experience in there which has survived and which helps give identity to the people at the time the Bible finally took shape centuries and centuries later,” Meyers said. There’s no archaeological evidence of the Exodus, either, Meyers said. “It doesn’t mean that there’s no kernel of truth to it,” she said. Apsell said she found it “extremely shocking” to learn that monotheism was a process that took hundreds of years.

Remind me! Now who was it that claimed that those who questioned the historicity of biblical narratives—the minimalists/nihilists—were guilty of dismissing the Bible as a pious fraud?
By: Puzzled on July 22, 2008
at 8:41 am
To borrow a phrase from Doc Holliday in the movie ‘Tombstone’ – ‘his hypocrisy knows no bounds.’
By: Jim on July 22, 2008
at 8:45 am
How is one TV movie going to change the beliefs of people who don’t really understand science ?” “It won’t,” Dever said. “It’s a waste of time to argue with fundamentalists.”
Well, he’s certainly correct about that!
By: Bob Schillaci on July 22, 2008
at 12:28 pm
I find it so interesting how threatened people get when one applies the same rational thought to the Bible as most people are expected to apply to a story in a newspaper.
Isn’t it better to know what is myth and what is true, than to blindly believe there is something magical about the ancient – and very human – collection of stories we call the Bible?
I think so.
But there are many who would rather hold to magical myths rather than simple fact.
By: ELBSeattle on July 22, 2008
at 2:10 pm
The problem, ELB, is that Dever here represents himself as a person who would agree with you whereas when he appears before conservative crowds his message is quite different. Further, he has accused those who hold views similar to the one he here presents, as being nihilists and enemies of the faith.
No one is threatened by Dever- we are aghast at his dissemblance.
By: Jim on July 22, 2008
at 2:21 pm
Same producer made a doc a few yrs back on some archaeology in the Dead Sea region using a colonoscope (sic)
For a review on this NOVA doc. see http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/23/arts/television/23heff.html
BTW, the BAR crowd was heavily involved from the beginning to the end, one of the few examples over three decades whereby BAR did some serious funding to the tune of $80,000 from a gift of $200,000 . Seems they have some serious ‘overhead’ charges.
By: Joe Zias on July 22, 2008
at 4:48 pm
Standard view. Nothing revolutionary here. To heck fundamentalists.
By: Ted Michael Morgan on July 22, 2008
at 7:47 pm
[...] An upcoming Nova special about biblical archaeology is being publicized in various newspapers. Jim West provides the links and his opinions. Explore posts in the same categories: [...]
By: Upcoming Special on Biblical Archaeology « Zionism and the State of Israel on July 23, 2008
at 1:52 am